Cheshire
County Superior Court Docket
# 213-2020-CV-00104
Natasha
Athens
Plaintiff
V
Governor
Sununu
Defendant
EX-PARTY NOTICE OF APPEAL
The Plaintiff sued the Defendant,
Governor Sununu, who used a play from a 102 year old playbook, just released in
the NYTimes on August 3, 2020. The Mask Slackers knew over a century ago,
that the Constitution prohibited the Government from a power grab, telling
people what to do, and enforcing anything that stole or inhibited freedom.
The plot was to destroy a healthy
economy and ruin a free election, and despite being forewarned by Attorney
General Barr that the Constitution was in place, multiple greedy bad Governors
used the "old playbook" to the letter. They did an illegal power grab that was not
legislated, (even though legislation was "in session" and they
bestowed upon the community illegal rules and orders, that were "renewed 5
times.
1.
In 1918, while most of this had to do w/ a flu, the
underlying component of abuse of power existed. People were jailed then,
and have been jailed now or failing to obey laws that "don't exist. In the end, Mask Slackers WON, as we are
winning now, and also showing the overreach, the power grab, the embezzlement,
and crimes within each state boundaries. Governor Sununu, the Defendant,
and the NH AG's office have been complicit in stealing funds meant to rescue to
a degree those fallen businesses that the governor might as well have ransacked
himself, for he alone left them destroyed an many unable to recover.
2.
The Defendant defied federal law, and aided and abetted
himself and others to a "money party" while depriving and eliminating
the people that needed those funds to survive his illicit lockdowns.
3.
The Defendant took additional swipes at the Plaintiff,
who sought using the Constitution to be able to aid her new business after the
illicit lockdown, and he was so abusive and out of control, that they purposely
made up rules that eliminated her right to the funds. In a piece of this case,
she put in a motion for her right to the funds, and the Defendant and his 4
attorney's defaulted, and lost the entire case.
4.
Once the Plaintiff sought her lawful default ruling, a
compromised judge, Judge Ruoff, did not issue that default ruling, and instead
unlawfully dismissed the case. The
Plaintiff sought only what was rightfully hers, and she fought for the other
businesses in her town that were wiped out by this 1 Defendant, in a matter of
30 days, then extended to 60 days, then renewed to 90 days, and then over 100
days.
The
Plaintiff applied for the PPP and was granted PPP funds, making her eligible as
a business for that limited portion of payroll protection. The Vice President, Naushaba Zahid of Bank
Small Business Banking at Bank of America 344 Montrose Ave, Lauren MD
20707 is the person that approved her
PPP loan. They applied to every
qualitifed business, without discrimination.
The Defendant, who has lined his own pockets, purposely eliminated the
Plaintiff, this is criminal. The
Plaintiff, as a business owner is entitled to the same funds as anyone else.
5.
The Defendant kept layering the CARES money, in each
level, he first eliminated sole proprietors, then “new businesses” and he
cannot. He also asked for invasive data
that was not required to obtain this money.
His illicit orders also tried to restructure space and cannot (the same
as in 1918 to force businesses to restructure their floor space, or sitting
space to 6 feet apart. Back in 1928, it was 4 feet apart. The
Defendant paid himself out of the funds, as well as a candidate for Senate, and current
Senator Shaheen, all paid themselves out of the funds, without oversight, and
continued to delay and play hardball with the rightful recipients of this
money.
Many qualified people were denied
funds, but offered loans because the funds were being embezzled by corrupt
political staff. In this video about
minute 20, Karen Testerman states that the legislation stated that they did not
work during the virus, or legislate anything. She also stated that the
Governor was paying himself out of the funds
6.
This blog kept the data of everything that happened in
the lower court, including the default of the Defendants, and the failure of
the judge to issue a default ruling, the basis for his job.
7.
The Plaintiff won this case, because 4 separate
attorney’s failed to file a timely pleading.
The AG cannot file pleadings after default, but they did. They cannot even legally file an appeal
brief. The Plaintiff filed criminal
complaints against all parties, including the judge for failure to adhere to
his OATH, and use the Constitution and terminate all of the Governor’s illegal
orders, and terminate his mask orders, social distancing, and closure of
businesses. The Judge’s ruling which
should have been a default ruling, bypassed the entire Constitution, and this
corrupt judge, appointed by Governor Sununu aided in the state destruction and
wipeout of small businesses. What is in
their wallets? Being appointed by the
Defendant means that if he can’t uphold his own oath, he cannot remain as a
judge.
8.
The Plaintiff, as a business owner, was entitled to run
her own private business without the interference from government. This is their rights. Government cannot enforce orders inside
privately owned businesses. The
Defendant and his attorneys do not use the rule of law, and were not prepared
to fight a case according to ANY form of law, they made up terms as they went
along. This is “Sharia Law” deemed 102
years ago NOT to hold up against the Constitution, and the “Mask Slackers”
won. The orders back then were declared
unconstitutional, even during a “flu scare”.
No one ever tried to override this victory in 102 years, therefore the
Mask Slackers case stands now as the case and ruling law against government abuses
of power. The conflict of interest of a
bad governor who owns his own business and so don’t his “friends” makes his own
handouts all called into question.
9.
The Defendants set themselves up from greed and
personal resentment and cannot, that is discrimination, and even though Judge
Ruoff received a video of funds being stolen and refused to rule on the case on
a Motion to Reconsider, that makes him a conspirator. All of them have been turned in to the AG.
10. The
President signed a new executive order in August to extend unemployment
benefits through the year and is holding all Governors accountable for 25% of
those monies, therefore there are still funds left and they are due everyone he
wiped out, including the Plaintiff. And
yet he has not made any new amendment following his last one where he
eliminated the Plaintiff by stating that sole proprietors had to have at least
one employee, and NO they do not. The
Defendant has to abide by the law.
On appeal, there is no one that can
uphold the illicit orders of the Defendant, from either playbook, his own
version of 2020, adding 2 additional feet of distance from the 1918 playbook,
nor the order for masking people, business owners, and then ordering those
businesses to mask themselves, and then force their customers to be
masked. The 2020 version was an illicit order, renewed 5 times, in a
state with a very low "rate" of infection, but the Governor refused
to act within the law, or the protection of all state citizens.
He destroyed the tourism, and
businesses that had either a winter, or summer business, usually a way to pay
for homes and income so people could live in the state. There are very
high property taxes, since there is not income tax, and this 1918 plot was
utilized despite what it did to everyone win the state. There are massive
evictions, and home losses, business losses, and people that cannot recover.
11. The
Defendant destroyed the schools, and kid’s rights to be in camp, or in social
settings. The Defendant is a criminal, and operating in the power of
state leadership, without consequences so far.
The NYT, which is infamous for fake news, and lies, printed this actual
re-enactment of the 2020 version, the only difference being timing. That
timing in history was a power grab for something else, this timing was to steal
an election. The Defendant has self interest in mind, and there can be no
ability for his crimes to be dissolved in a corrupt judicial system, because
anyone that ignores his default, and illicit orders becomes complicit.
In 1918, everything was undone by
the Mask Slackers in court, and the country survived and restored itself.
In 2020, the same rule of law that found those 1918 orders to be
unconstitutional, are still in effect today, since no one could ever get away
w/ the theft of freedom of an entire population.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff who only
sought her rightful portion of federal funds and has not been paid them, seeks
the $200K that they defaulted on answering under court rules.
In addition, she seeks the $5M she
sued for, since they refused to settle. The Plaintiff offered at the hearing, and in
court pleadings to be paid for her privacy and freedom being stolen. Not liking the Plaintiff, being mad at the
Plaintiff, even “loathing” the lawful Plaintiff does not allow for non-payment
of these monies. The bias and lack of
law is breaking this country, and they aim to only pay themselves and destroy
anyone’s right to success.
The Plaintiff can be paid any
portion of this money on appeal, since the Defaulted Defendants cannot even
lawfully overbill and file an answer.
Once a Defendant defaults, they cannot even file for an appearance and no
one else can file on their behalf that is according to the Constitution, which
they don’t use. Criminal charges are
sought against all parties, as the world watches, and these predators assume
that it will never come back on them, they continue to overbill, lie, cheat and
steal without conscious, however legally, this case has been won by the
Plaintiff and she needs a ruling stating that she is indeed to be paid from the
Default of the Defendant’s, not the illicit case dismissal.
The Plaintiff also seeks that the
court uphold the ruling of the “Mask Slackers” case of 1918 in which it was
deemed unconstitutional to even try to enforce an order that stole
freedom. This Defendant, has no power to
enforce such an order and all of his terms in his voluminous executive orders
must hereby be terminated as a matter of law.
Any compromised judges on this appeal need to be removed the bench if
they cannot uphold the 1918 ruling that is standing law on masks etc.
/s/
Natasha Athens This is being
filed Ex-Party, since the Defendant defaulted.
There is no party to serve this appeal
August 10, 2020
